It is not often that we see an editorial in a major, high impact journal, directly attacking another published paper. Such a situation has just occurred in the British Journal of Sports Medicine (BJSM), with an Editorial just published making the following extraordinary statement Unfortunately, as with many studies investigating PRP, we believe it falls…
Director of Bartold Clinical
You must be logged in to post a comment.
“However, it is this review process that should act as the watchdog, not the BJSM.” I agree but when that process clearly fails someone’s got to call them out and it should be someone with a loud voice.
I agree too Steve.. it is just the BJSM’s Holier than Thou appraoch that sticks in my craw.. their review process is far from ideal..
Pot calling the kettle black – I know what you mean.