In fact, development of the Vaporfly shoe began way back in 2013 and this is what that domination has looked like since 2016:
– Eliud Kipchoge, wearing a prototype Nike AlphaFly, became the first man to break two hours for the marathon in Vienna last year, albeit in an unofficial race.
– The Kenyan also wore a version of the shoes when he set the official world record of 2:01.39. Kipchoge’s 78-second improvement on the existing record was the largest improvement in over 50 years.
– His compatriot Brigid Kosgei beat Paula Radcliffe’s world marathon record in October in the latest version of the shoes, reducing the mark by 81 seconds to (2:14.4).
– Dutchwoman Sifan Hassan took double gold at the World Championships in Doha in September, when she won the 1,500m and 10,000m in a track spike version of the shoe.
– December 2019 Uganda’s Joshua Cheptegei broke the 10-year-old 10km road world record in Valencia by six seconds. The top five at the event all wore a version of Nike’s Zoom Vaporfly 4%.
Analysis of the world rankings shows that in 2019, twice as many men ran under 2:10 and twice as many women went under 2:27 as compared to 2016.
Eight of the 12 fastest men’s marathons in history have been run in the last year.
The Ultimate Super Shoe? The Nike Air Zoom Alphafly Next%
To say these results are unprecedented would be a massive understatement.
The other big manufacturers got caught out, and only now are we starting to see anything that might look like competition to Nike’s Super Shoes.
To date, adidas, ASICS and Mizuno have not released a shoe realising the definition of a Super Shoe.
Skechers GORun Speed Elite Hyper
Saucony Endorphin Pro
Brooks Hyperion Pro 2
New Balance Fuel Cell TC
Hoka One One Carbon X
There has been a lot of chatter about why the Super Shoes are so fast. Initially many called out the carbon fibre plate, claiming it acted like a spring to propel the athlete forward.
That clearly is not the case, since, at best, the plate can only act as a lever, which is quite different to a spring!
Research published recently by Nike (1) has, however, shown that the Vaporfly Next% has an effect at the level of the 1st metatarsaophalangeal joint, by reducing the net energy loss without increasing the mechanical demand at the ankle as we would expect.
It seems more likely that the effect of these shoe is a sum of all parts..
Will these shoes work for everyone? Well that seems unlikely, becasue despite some common ground, the shoes are all quite different. The NB TC for example was never going be a direct competitor to the Nike Vaporfly Next%. “TC” in FuelCell TC is an acronym for “Training and Competition”, the Nike Vaporfly Next% is purely a competition shoe,
There is also the question of responders versus non responders. Sports scientist Ross Tucker makes this point at length in an excellent blog here, but to summarise, Tucker’s argument is that Nike’s shoe tech gives so great an advantage to some athletes over others that it renders training, tactics and nutrition almost inconsequential – and as such, we cannot have faith in what we’re watching.
Scroll through the infogram from our Instagram account for a Super Shoe Snapshot
The biggest question for me is, “is there a downside to the Super Shoes”.
In other words, could they potentially create injury.
Well, given they change running style and biomechanics, this is a distinct possibility. And we have good data that both minimalist and maximalist shoes can be implicated with increases in site specific, running related injury.
I see not much difference between the new Super Shoes and the minimalist trend which caused such division in the industry.
the question is no are they good or bad, it is will they suit the specific runner and do they have the capacity to safely utelize the unique characteristics of this tye of footwear?
As with minimalism, time will tell.
References
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.